vv0.2.100
Intermediate tutorial

Detached Structures: Barn, ADU, Detached Garage in Cost Seg

How a detached barn, garage, or ADU shows up as a 15-year land improvement bump, how the detached_sqft scaling works, and a worked example.

Detached Structures: Barn, ADU, Detached Garage in Cost Seg

This tutorial covers a single mechanic: how the calculator scales the 15-year land-improvement bucket based on the size of detached structures on the property — a barn, a workshop, a detached garage, an accessory dwelling unit. The mechanic lives in the detached_structures and detached_sqft fields and produces a percentage bump capped at 3% of basis.

Why a detached structure is not part of the building shell

The 27.5-year (residential rental) and 39-year (nonresidential real property) MACRS schedules apply to the building shell: walls, roof, foundation, structural framing of the dwelling unit being rented. A separately-constructed structure on the same parcel — a barn, a detached two-car garage, an ADU on a slab in the backyard — is a separate asset. Pub 946 Asset Class 00.3 (land improvements) and 01.1 through 01.4 (farm-related structures) handle most of these as 15-year or 20-year MACRS property.

The cost-seg implication: the cost basis attributable to a detached structure should not ride the 27.5-year schedule by default. Engineering deliverables call this out explicitly — a detached 1,200-sqft barn on a rural Hill Country STR represents real basis dollars that an engineer will reclassify to a faster recovery period.

What the calculator's detached_sqft field does

The questionnaire collects two inputs:

The engine maps detached_sqft to a 15-year-bucket bump in _compute_adjustments (cost_seg/engine.py):

``python if inp.detached_structures and inp.detached_sqft > 0: pct = min(inp.detached_sqft / 100 * 0.001, 0.03) ``

That formula reads: 0.1% per 100 square feet, capped at 3%. A 600 sqft detached garage adds 0.6% to the 15-year class. A 1,500 sqft barn adds 1.5%. A 3,500 sqft set of structures hits the 3% cap. The cap exists because beyond a certain size the structure starts approaching the dollar-impact of the dwelling itself, and the formula can no longer pretend a single percentage of total basis represents the structure honestly.

This is a screening simplification. A real engineering study would assign a cost-per-square-foot to the detached structure (RS Means or vendor invoice) and reclassify that dollar amount precisely; the calculator's approach is good enough to surface whether a study is worth commissioning.

Worked example — STR with detached barn and ADU

A property owner buys a 4-bedroom rural STR in March 2026 for $850,000 with $200,000 allocated to land, leaving $650,000 of depreciable basis. The property has a 1,400 sqft detached barn (used for tenant storage and event hosting) and a 600 sqft detached ADU rented separately on the same listing — total detached_sqft = 2,000.

The detached bump: 2,000 / 100 × 0.001 = 0.020 = 2.0% added to the 15-year class.

Base STR allocation (13% / 1% / 8%) plus the 2.0% detached bump on the 15-year class:

At 100% bonus depreciation, the year-1 deduction on the accelerable bucket ($156,000) is $156,000 plus partial-year building S/L (March placement, 9.5 months) of $494,000 / 27.5 × 9.5/12 ≈ $15,200. Total year-1 deduction ≈ $171,200. At a 32% bracket, that's roughly $54,800 of year-1 federal tax effect.

The detached structures are contributing roughly $13,000 of accelerable basis ($650,000 × 2%), which translates to about $4,200 of year-1 tax effect on a 100% bonus year — the difference between a 50% bracket and a 60% bracket on a CPA conversation.

Try an STR with detached structures →

When a detached structure is its own asset entry

Engineering deliverables sometimes treat a substantial detached structure (large barn, full-sized ADU, separate workshop) as a separately-listed asset on the depreciation schedule, with its own placed-in-service date and basis. The cost is allocated from the purchase price (or from construction invoices if built later), and the structure depreciates on its own MACRS line. This produces a more defensible audit position than rolling the structure into a percentage of total basis.

For a screening calculator the bump is sufficient — but the property owner should know the engineering version goes further. An ADU large enough to operate as a separate rental unit, in particular, is best handled as its own depreciable asset.

Compare a property without detached structures →

Citations

Disclaimer. This tutorial describes general federal tax concepts. TaxProtestTx (Nought Labs LLC) is a feasibility-screening tool, not tax advice or a cost segregation study. Calculator output cannot be relied on under Treasury Circular 230. Consult a qualified CPA, EA, or attorney before filing. Results are not guaranteed.

Try it on your property

Open the calculator
Disclaimer. This page describes general federal tax concepts. TaxProtestTx (Nought Labs LLC) is a feasibility-screening tool, not tax advice or a cost segregation study. The calculator output cannot be relied on under Treasury Circular 230. Consult a qualified CPA, EA, or attorney before filing. Results are not guaranteed.