vv0.2.100
Intermediate tutorial

Large Lot Adjustments (>0.5 Acre): More 15-Year Land Improvements

How a lot bigger than 0.5 acre adds basis to the 15-year bucket through site-work assumptions: drainage, grading, paths, perimeter fence, irrigation.

Large Lot Adjustments (>0.5 Acre): More 15-Year Land Improvements

This tutorial covers a single mechanic: how the calculator scales the 15-year land-improvement bucket when lot_acres > 0.5. The reasoning follows the cost-engineering convention that larger residential lots carry more site improvements — graded drainage paths, perimeter walkways, retaining elements, distributed landscaping, longer driveway runs — and those site improvements are land improvements under Pub 946 Asset Class 00.3, eligible for 15-year MACRS.

What the formula actually does

In cost_seg/engine.py, the large-lot adjustment is:

``python if inp.lot_acres > 0.5: pct = min((inp.lot_acres - 0.5) * 0.01, 0.02) ``

Reading the formula:

The cap exists because beyond about 2 acres the marginal site-work dollars are unlikely to scale linearly with acreage — a 10-acre rural property typically has 2 acres of improved yard around the dwelling and 8 acres of unimproved pasture or woods. The 2% cap reflects that ceiling on the improved-site portion.

Why 15-year and not 27.5-year

Site improvements that exist independently of the building shell — the driveway run from the road, the perimeter fence, the irrigation lines, the graded drainage swale, the walkway from the driveway to the front door — are §1245 land improvements under IRC §168(e)(3)(E)(iv). They depreciate on a 15-year MACRS schedule with 150% declining balance, accept bonus depreciation, and are eligible for the 100% bonus rate currently in effect under OBBBA.

The default depreciation pattern — when no cost-seg study is performed — tends to roll all of these into the 27.5-year residential building schedule, which loses roughly 12 years of accelerated recovery on the affected dollars. The screening calculator's lot-size bump is a coarse proxy for the basis dollars an engineering study would explicitly identify and reclassify.

Worked example — 1.4-acre LTR

A property owner buys a 4-bedroom long-term rental in May 2026 for $625,000 with $130,000 allocated to land, leaving $495,000 of depreciable basis. The lot is 1.4 acres with a paved driveway, perimeter fence, irrigation system, and mature landscaping. The owner enters lot_acres=1.4.

The large-lot bump: (1.4 − 0.5) × 0.01 = 0.9% added to the 15-year class.

Base LTR allocation (10% / 0.5% / 7%) plus the 0.9% lot bump on the 15-year class:

At 100% bonus depreciation, the year-1 accelerable deduction is $91,080. Add partial-year mid-month May building S/L of $403,920 / 27.5 × 7.5/12 ≈ $9,180 and the year-1 deduction lands at roughly $100,260. At a 32% bracket, year-1 federal tax effect ≈ $32,080.

The large-lot bump alone is contributing roughly $4,455 of accelerable basis (0.9% of $495,000), which translates to about $1,425 of year-1 tax effect on its own — modest but additive when combined with explicit feature flags (a separate fence-length bump, a separate driveway bump, a separate irrigation flag).

Try a 1.4-acre LTR estimate →

Stacking with explicit feature flags

The questionnaire also collects a fence type with length, a driveway type with length, and irrigation as separate flags. These produce their own bumps:

A 1.4-acre lot with all three flags ticked adds the lot bump (+0.9%) plus the explicit flags (+2.2%) for a total of 3.1% on the 15-year bucket — roughly $15,300 of additional accelerable basis on a $495,000 depreciable basis. That's about $4,900 of year-1 federal tax effect at 100% bonus and a 32% bracket.

The lot bump and the explicit flags do not double-count in the same way finish_level does on per-item interior upgrades — site improvements are physically distinct, and the calculator treats them additively. A 50% total-reclassification cap applies as a safety valve for exotic stacking, but a normal residential cost-seg estimate stays well below it.

See a 2-acre rural LTR →

Citations

Disclaimer. This tutorial describes general federal tax concepts. TaxProtestTx (Nought Labs LLC) is a feasibility-screening tool, not tax advice or a cost segregation study. Calculator output cannot be relied on under Treasury Circular 230. Consult a qualified CPA, EA, or attorney before filing. Results are not guaranteed.

Try it on your property

Open the calculator
Disclaimer. This page describes general federal tax concepts. TaxProtestTx (Nought Labs LLC) is a feasibility-screening tool, not tax advice or a cost segregation study. The calculator output cannot be relied on under Treasury Circular 230. Consult a qualified CPA, EA, or attorney before filing. Results are not guaranteed.